PotterDB vs SpaceTradersAPI
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
PotterDB vs SpaceTradersAPI: common questions
Which is more reliable, PotterDB or SpaceTradersAPI?
On our scheduled checks, SpaceTradersAPI leads on measured uptime — PotterDB at 99.44% versus SpaceTradersAPI at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, PotterDB or SpaceTradersAPI?
PotterDB has the lower median latency in our checks — PotterDB responds in 326 ms versus SpaceTradersAPI at 369 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do PotterDB and SpaceTradersAPI need an API key?
PotterDB needs no key, while SpaceTradersAPI requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for PotterDB first.
Can I call PotterDB and SpaceTradersAPI from the browser?
Yes — both PotterDB and SpaceTradersAPI send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are PotterDB and SpaceTradersAPI free for commercial use?
PotterDB has unclear commercial terms, and SpaceTradersAPI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.