PotterDB vs Raider
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
PotterDB vs Raider: common questions
Which is more reliable, PotterDB or Raider?
On our scheduled checks, PotterDB leads on measured uptime — PotterDB at 99.44% versus Raider at 98.9% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, PotterDB or Raider?
Raider has the lower median latency in our checks — PotterDB responds in 326 ms versus Raider at 140 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do PotterDB and Raider need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — PotterDB is callable with no signup, and Raider is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call PotterDB and Raider from the browser?
Yes — both PotterDB and Raider send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are PotterDB and Raider free for commercial use?
PotterDB has unclear commercial terms, and Raider has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.