shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

PotterDB vs Psychonauts API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIPotterDBNEW—Psychonauts APINEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (data derived from Harry Potter Fandom, CC BY-SA)Unverified; fan tribute, game © Double Fine
Free tierFree — no keyFree, no API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

PotterDB vs Psychonauts API: common questions

Which is more reliable, PotterDB or Psychonauts API?

On our scheduled checks, Psychonauts API leads on measured uptime — PotterDB at —% versus Psychonauts API at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do PotterDB and Psychonauts API need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — PotterDB is callable with no signup, and Psychonauts API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call PotterDB and Psychonauts API from the browser?

Only PotterDB is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Psychonauts API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are PotterDB and Psychonauts API free for commercial use?

PotterDB has unclear commercial terms, and Psychonauts API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.