shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

PotterDB vs Psychonauts API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIPotterDBHEALTHY90Psychonauts APIHEALTHY79
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms5252979
P95 · ms11933699
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (data derived from Harry Potter Fandom, CC BY-SA)Unverified; fan tribute, game © Double Fine
Free tierFree — no keyFree, no API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

PotterDB vs Psychonauts API: common questions

Which is more reliable, PotterDB or Psychonauts API?

On our scheduled checks, PotterDB leads on measured uptime — PotterDB at 100% versus Psychonauts API at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, PotterDB or Psychonauts API?

PotterDB has the lower median latency in our checks — PotterDB responds in 525 ms versus Psychonauts API at 2979 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do PotterDB and Psychonauts API need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — PotterDB is callable with no signup, and Psychonauts API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call PotterDB and Psychonauts API from the browser?

Only PotterDB is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Psychonauts API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are PotterDB and Psychonauts API free for commercial use?

PotterDB has unclear commercial terms, and Psychonauts API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.