Postman Echo vs ScrapingDog

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms201195
P95 · ms815621
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Postman Echo vs ScrapingDog: common questions

Which is more reliable, Postman Echo or ScrapingDog?

Both are neck-and-neck — Postman Echo and ScrapingDog each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Postman Echo or ScrapingDog?

ScrapingDog has the lower median latency in our checks — Postman Echo responds in 201 ms versus ScrapingDog at 195 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Postman Echo and ScrapingDog need an API key?

Postman Echo needs no key, while ScrapingDog requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Postman Echo first.

Can I call Postman Echo and ScrapingDog from the browser?

Only ScrapingDog is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Postman Echo needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Postman Echo and ScrapingDog free for commercial use?

Postman Echo has unclear commercial terms, and ScrapingDog has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.