Postman Echo vs scrapestack

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms201346
P95 · ms815844
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Postman Echo vs scrapestack: common questions

Which is more reliable, Postman Echo or scrapestack?

Both are neck-and-neck — Postman Echo and scrapestack each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Postman Echo or scrapestack?

Postman Echo has the lower median latency in our checks — Postman Echo responds in 201 ms versus scrapestack at 346 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Postman Echo and scrapestack need an API key?

Postman Echo needs no key, while scrapestack requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Postman Echo first.

Can I call Postman Echo and scrapestack from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Postman Echo and scrapestack from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Postman Echo and scrapestack free for commercial use?

Postman Echo has unclear commercial terms, and scrapestack has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.