Postman Echo vs PurgoMalum

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%86.3%
Uptime · 30d100%85.0%
P50 · ms201423
P95 · ms8154833
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Postman Echo vs PurgoMalum: common questions

Which is more reliable, Postman Echo or PurgoMalum?

On our scheduled checks, Postman Echo leads on measured uptime — Postman Echo at 100% versus PurgoMalum at 86.3% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Postman Echo or PurgoMalum?

Postman Echo has the lower median latency in our checks — Postman Echo responds in 201 ms versus PurgoMalum at 423 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Postman Echo and PurgoMalum need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Postman Echo is callable with no signup, and PurgoMalum is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Postman Echo and PurgoMalum from the browser?

Only PurgoMalum is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Postman Echo needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Postman Echo and PurgoMalum free for commercial use?

Postman Echo has unclear commercial terms, and PurgoMalum has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.