Pokefact API vs Raider

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%98.9%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms1602140
P95 · ms25164160
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified (Blizzard game data)
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree, no API key for public data
Rate limitUnpublished300 req/window · 0 remaining · resets 1787935537
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Pokefact API vs Raider: common questions

Which is more reliable, Pokefact API or Raider?

On our scheduled checks, Pokefact API leads on measured uptime — Pokefact API at 100% versus Raider at 98.9% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Pokefact API or Raider?

Raider has the lower median latency in our checks — Pokefact API responds in 1602 ms versus Raider at 140 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Pokefact API and Raider need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Pokefact API is callable with no signup, and Raider is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Pokefact API and Raider from the browser?

Yes — both Pokefact API and Raider send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Pokefact API and Raider free for commercial use?

Pokefact API has unclear commercial terms, and Raider has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.