PlayerDB vs PotterDB
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
PlayerDB vs PotterDB: common questions
Which is more reliable, PlayerDB or PotterDB?
On our scheduled checks, PlayerDB leads on measured uptime — PlayerDB at 100% versus PotterDB at 99.44% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, PlayerDB or PotterDB?
PlayerDB has the lower median latency in our checks — PlayerDB responds in 44 ms versus PotterDB at 326 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do PlayerDB and PotterDB need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — PlayerDB is callable with no signup, and PotterDB is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call PlayerDB and PotterDB from the browser?
Yes — both PlayerDB and PotterDB send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are PlayerDB and PotterDB free for commercial use?
PlayerDB has unclear commercial terms, and PotterDB has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.