PixMind API vs ShotOG

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms1443180
P95 · ms2782647
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-09-092026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

PixMind API vs ShotOG: common questions

Which is more reliable, PixMind API or ShotOG?

Both are neck-and-neck — PixMind API and ShotOG each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, PixMind API or ShotOG?

ShotOG has the lower median latency in our checks — PixMind API responds in 1443 ms versus ShotOG at 180 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do PixMind API and ShotOG need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — PixMind API uses an API key and ShotOG uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call PixMind API and ShotOG from the browser?

Only PixMind API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. ShotOG needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are PixMind API and ShotOG free for commercial use?

PixMind API has unclear commercial terms, and ShotOG has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.