PikaSim vs Transport for Spain

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms743603
P95 · ms42681720
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — no key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

PikaSim vs Transport for Spain: common questions

Which is more reliable, PikaSim or Transport for Spain?

Both are neck-and-neck — PikaSim and Transport for Spain each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, PikaSim or Transport for Spain?

Transport for Spain has the lower median latency in our checks — PikaSim responds in 743 ms versus Transport for Spain at 603 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do PikaSim and Transport for Spain need an API key?

Transport for Spain needs no key, while PikaSim requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Transport for Spain first.

Can I call PikaSim and Transport for Spain from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call PikaSim and Transport for Spain from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are PikaSim and Transport for Spain free for commercial use?

PikaSim has unclear commercial terms, and Transport for Spain has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.