PikaSim vs StayingAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms250143
P95 · ms2900913
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-09-21
operationalpartialdownno data

PikaSim vs StayingAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, PikaSim or StayingAPI?

Both are neck-and-neck — PikaSim and StayingAPI each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, PikaSim or StayingAPI?

StayingAPI has the lower median latency in our checks — PikaSim responds in 250 ms versus StayingAPI at 143 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do PikaSim and StayingAPI need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — PikaSim uses an API key and StayingAPI uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call PikaSim and StayingAPI from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call PikaSim and StayingAPI from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are PikaSim and StayingAPI free for commercial use?

PikaSim has unclear commercial terms, and StayingAPI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.