PhishStats vs Portscan

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d5.9%99.02%
Uptime · 30d1.7%100%
P50 · ms240335
P95 · ms352734
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limit20 req/window · 19 remaining · resets 50Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

PhishStats vs Portscan: common questions

Which is more reliable, PhishStats or Portscan?

On our scheduled checks, Portscan leads on measured uptime — PhishStats at 5.9% versus Portscan at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, PhishStats or Portscan?

PhishStats has the lower median latency in our checks — PhishStats responds in 240 ms versus Portscan at 335 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do PhishStats and Portscan need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — PhishStats is callable with no signup, and Portscan is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call PhishStats and Portscan from the browser?

Only Portscan is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. PhishStats needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are PhishStats and Portscan free for commercial use?

PhishStats has unclear commercial terms, and Portscan has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.