Passantenfrequenzen Zürich vs SiteIntel

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms5691005
P95 · ms12283849
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Passantenfrequenzen Zürich vs SiteIntel: common questions

Which is more reliable, Passantenfrequenzen Zürich or SiteIntel?

Both are neck-and-neck — Passantenfrequenzen Zürich and SiteIntel each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Passantenfrequenzen Zürich or SiteIntel?

Passantenfrequenzen Zürich has the lower median latency in our checks — Passantenfrequenzen Zürich responds in 569 ms versus SiteIntel at 1005 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Passantenfrequenzen Zürich and SiteIntel need an API key?

Passantenfrequenzen Zürich needs no key, while SiteIntel requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Passantenfrequenzen Zürich first.

Can I call Passantenfrequenzen Zürich and SiteIntel from the browser?

Only Passantenfrequenzen Zürich is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. SiteIntel needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Passantenfrequenzen Zürich and SiteIntel free for commercial use?

Passantenfrequenzen Zürich has unclear commercial terms, and SiteIntel has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.