Passantenfrequenzen Zürich vs Randommer

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms
P95 · ms
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Passantenfrequenzen Zürich vs Randommer: common questions

Which is more reliable, Passantenfrequenzen Zürich or Randommer?

On our scheduled checks, Randommer leads on measured uptime — Passantenfrequenzen Zürich at —% versus Randommer at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Passantenfrequenzen Zürich and Randommer need an API key?

Passantenfrequenzen Zürich needs no key, while Randommer requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Passantenfrequenzen Zürich first.

Can I call Passantenfrequenzen Zürich and Randommer from the browser?

Yes — both Passantenfrequenzen Zürich and Randommer send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Passantenfrequenzen Zürich and Randommer free for commercial use?

Passantenfrequenzen Zürich has unclear commercial terms, and Randommer has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.