ParlayAPI vs ScrapingDog

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d87.5%100%
Uptime · 30d87.5%100%
P50 · ms211127
P95 · ms1536526
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-10-042026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

ParlayAPI vs ScrapingDog: common questions

Which is more reliable, ParlayAPI or ScrapingDog?

On our scheduled checks, ScrapingDog leads on measured uptime — ParlayAPI at 87.5% versus ScrapingDog at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, ParlayAPI or ScrapingDog?

ScrapingDog has the lower median latency in our checks — ParlayAPI responds in 211 ms versus ScrapingDog at 127 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do ParlayAPI and ScrapingDog need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — ParlayAPI uses an API key and ScrapingDog uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call ParlayAPI and ScrapingDog from the browser?

Only ScrapingDog is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. ParlayAPI needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are ParlayAPI and ScrapingDog free for commercial use?

ParlayAPI has unclear commercial terms, and ScrapingDog has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.