Parkleitsystem API vs Ziptastic

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms1097366
P95 · ms45082018
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Parkleitsystem API vs Ziptastic: common questions

Which is more reliable, Parkleitsystem API or Ziptastic?

Both are neck-and-neck — Parkleitsystem API and Ziptastic each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Parkleitsystem API or Ziptastic?

Ziptastic has the lower median latency in our checks — Parkleitsystem API responds in 1097 ms versus Ziptastic at 366 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Parkleitsystem API and Ziptastic need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Parkleitsystem API is callable with no signup, and Ziptastic is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Parkleitsystem API and Ziptastic from the browser?

Only Ziptastic is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Parkleitsystem API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Parkleitsystem API and Ziptastic free for commercial use?

Parkleitsystem API has unclear commercial terms, and Ziptastic has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.