shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

PandaScore REST API for All Videogames vs TasteDive

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIPandaScore REST API for All VideogamesNEW—TasteDiveNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

PandaScore REST API for All Videogames vs TasteDive: common questions

Which is more reliable, PandaScore REST API for All Videogames or TasteDive?

On our scheduled checks, TasteDive leads on measured uptime — PandaScore REST API for All Videogames at —% versus TasteDive at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do PandaScore REST API for All Videogames and TasteDive need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — PandaScore REST API for All Videogames uses an API key and TasteDive uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call PandaScore REST API for All Videogames and TasteDive from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call PandaScore REST API for All Videogames and TasteDive from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are PandaScore REST API for All Videogames and TasteDive free for commercial use?

PandaScore REST API for All Videogames has unclear commercial terms, and TasteDive has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.