shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Openwhyd vs SWAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIOpenwhydHEALTHY84SWAPIHEALTHY73
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.0%66.7%
Uptime · 30d100%43.3%
P50 · ms219483
P95 · ms10551451
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limit100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Openwhyd vs SWAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, Openwhyd or SWAPI?

On our scheduled checks, Openwhyd leads on measured uptime — Openwhyd at 98.0% versus SWAPI at 66.7% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Openwhyd or SWAPI?

Openwhyd has the lower median latency in our checks — Openwhyd responds in 219 ms versus SWAPI at 483 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Openwhyd and SWAPI need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Openwhyd is callable with no signup, and SWAPI is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Openwhyd and SWAPI from the browser?

Only SWAPI is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Openwhyd needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Openwhyd and SWAPI free for commercial use?

Openwhyd has unclear commercial terms, and SWAPI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.