openSenseMap vs wttr.in

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d90.2%95.1%
Uptime · 30d90.0%98.3%
P50 · ms655700
P95 · ms41394900
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseOpen data (license set per senseBox; often public domain)Unverified
Free tierFree (open-source citizen-science platform)Free — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished (informal per-IP throttling)
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

openSenseMap vs wttr.in: common questions

Which is more reliable, openSenseMap or wttr.in?

On our scheduled checks, wttr.in leads on measured uptime — openSenseMap at 90.2% versus wttr.in at 95.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, openSenseMap or wttr.in?

openSenseMap has the lower median latency in our checks — openSenseMap responds in 655 ms versus wttr.in at 700 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do openSenseMap and wttr.in need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — openSenseMap is callable with no signup, and wttr.in is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call openSenseMap and wttr.in from the browser?

Yes — both openSenseMap and wttr.in send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are openSenseMap and wttr.in free for commercial use?

openSenseMap has unclear commercial terms, and wttr.in has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.