OpenSanctions vs Zhipu AI API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms387900
P95 · ms41833308
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

OpenSanctions vs Zhipu AI API: common questions

Which is more reliable, OpenSanctions or Zhipu AI API?

Both are neck-and-neck — OpenSanctions and Zhipu AI API each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, OpenSanctions or Zhipu AI API?

OpenSanctions has the lower median latency in our checks — OpenSanctions responds in 387 ms versus Zhipu AI API at 900 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do OpenSanctions and Zhipu AI API need an API key?

OpenSanctions needs no key, while Zhipu AI API requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for OpenSanctions first.

Can I call OpenSanctions and Zhipu AI API from the browser?

Yes — both OpenSanctions and Zhipu AI API send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are OpenSanctions and Zhipu AI API free for commercial use?

OpenSanctions has unclear commercial terms, and Zhipu AI API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.