OpenSanctions vs The Guardian

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%98.0%
Uptime · 30d100%98.3%
P50 · ms387742
P95 · ms41832726
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree developer key — registration required
Rate limitUnpublished5000 calls/day (developer tier)
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

OpenSanctions vs The Guardian: common questions

Which is more reliable, OpenSanctions or The Guardian?

On our scheduled checks, OpenSanctions leads on measured uptime — OpenSanctions at 100% versus The Guardian at 98.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, OpenSanctions or The Guardian?

OpenSanctions has the lower median latency in our checks — OpenSanctions responds in 387 ms versus The Guardian at 742 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do OpenSanctions and The Guardian need an API key?

OpenSanctions needs no key, while The Guardian requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for OpenSanctions first.

Can I call OpenSanctions and The Guardian from the browser?

Yes — both OpenSanctions and The Guardian send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are OpenSanctions and The Guardian free for commercial use?

OpenSanctions has unclear commercial terms, and The Guardian has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.