OpenQR vs TotalShiftLeft Sandbox

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms1125328
P95 · ms28511741
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree — open sandbox, auth optional
Rate limitUnpublished100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

OpenQR vs TotalShiftLeft Sandbox: common questions

Which is more reliable, OpenQR or TotalShiftLeft Sandbox?

Both are neck-and-neck — OpenQR and TotalShiftLeft Sandbox each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, OpenQR or TotalShiftLeft Sandbox?

TotalShiftLeft Sandbox has the lower median latency in our checks — OpenQR responds in 1125 ms versus TotalShiftLeft Sandbox at 328 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do OpenQR and TotalShiftLeft Sandbox need an API key?

TotalShiftLeft Sandbox needs no key, while OpenQR requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for TotalShiftLeft Sandbox first.

Can I call OpenQR and TotalShiftLeft Sandbox from the browser?

Only OpenQR is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. TotalShiftLeft Sandbox needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are OpenQR and TotalShiftLeft Sandbox free for commercial use?

OpenQR has unclear commercial terms, and TotalShiftLeft Sandbox has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.