shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

openFDA vs WhiskyHunter

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIopenFDANEW—WhiskyHunterNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no API key
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

openFDA vs WhiskyHunter: common questions

Which is more reliable, openFDA or WhiskyHunter?

On our scheduled checks, WhiskyHunter leads on measured uptime — openFDA at —% versus WhiskyHunter at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do openFDA and WhiskyHunter need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — openFDA is callable with no signup, and WhiskyHunter is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call openFDA and WhiskyHunter from the browser?

Only openFDA is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. WhiskyHunter needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are openFDA and WhiskyHunter free for commercial use?

openFDA has unclear commercial terms, and WhiskyHunter has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.