openFDA vs TheSportsDB

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d94.1%55.9%
Uptime · 30d93.3%56.7%
P50 · ms1187238
P95 · ms46613182
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedRetry-After: 92s
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

openFDA vs TheSportsDB: common questions

Which is more reliable, openFDA or TheSportsDB?

On our scheduled checks, openFDA leads on measured uptime — openFDA at 94.1% versus TheSportsDB at 55.9% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, openFDA or TheSportsDB?

TheSportsDB has the lower median latency in our checks — openFDA responds in 1187 ms versus TheSportsDB at 238 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do openFDA and TheSportsDB need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — openFDA is callable with no signup, and TheSportsDB is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call openFDA and TheSportsDB from the browser?

Only openFDA is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. TheSportsDB needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are openFDA and TheSportsDB free for commercial use?

openFDA has unclear commercial terms, and TheSportsDB has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.