OpenF1 vs TheCocktailDB
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
OpenF1 vs TheCocktailDB: common questions
Which is more reliable, OpenF1 or TheCocktailDB?
On our scheduled checks, TheCocktailDB leads on measured uptime — OpenF1 at 47.1% versus TheCocktailDB at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, OpenF1 or TheCocktailDB?
TheCocktailDB has the lower median latency in our checks — OpenF1 responds in 747 ms versus TheCocktailDB at 300 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do OpenF1 and TheCocktailDB need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — OpenF1 is callable with no signup, and TheCocktailDB is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call OpenF1 and TheCocktailDB from the browser?
Yes — both OpenF1 and TheCocktailDB send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are OpenF1 and TheCocktailDB free for commercial use?
OpenF1 has unclear commercial terms, and TheCocktailDB has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.