OpenF1 vs SportScore

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d47.1%87.3%
Uptime · 30d41.7%86.7%
P50 · ms747288
P95 · ms35252112
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree & open (historical); real-time may require a free accountFree — no key (attribution tier)
Rate limitRetry-After: 60sRetry-After: 5s
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

OpenF1 vs SportScore: common questions

Which is more reliable, OpenF1 or SportScore?

On our scheduled checks, SportScore leads on measured uptime — OpenF1 at 47.1% versus SportScore at 87.3% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, OpenF1 or SportScore?

SportScore has the lower median latency in our checks — OpenF1 responds in 747 ms versus SportScore at 288 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do OpenF1 and SportScore need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — OpenF1 is callable with no signup, and SportScore is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call OpenF1 and SportScore from the browser?

Only OpenF1 is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. SportScore needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are OpenF1 and SportScore free for commercial use?

OpenF1 has unclear commercial terms, and SportScore has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.