Open-Meteo vs wttr.in

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d95.1%95.1%
Uptime · 30d93.3%98.3%
P50 · ms673700
P95 · ms11934900
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial usenounclear
Data licenseCC-BY 4.0Unverified
Free tier<10,000 calls/day, no signupFree — limits not published
Rate limit600/min · 5,000/hourUnpublished (informal per-IP throttling)
In directory since2026-05-022026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Open-Meteo vs wttr.in: common questions

Which is more reliable, Open-Meteo or wttr.in?

Both are neck-and-neck — Open-Meteo and wttr.in each measure 95.1% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Open-Meteo or wttr.in?

Open-Meteo has the lower median latency in our checks — Open-Meteo responds in 673 ms versus wttr.in at 700 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Open-Meteo and wttr.in need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Open-Meteo is callable with no signup, and wttr.in is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Open-Meteo and wttr.in from the browser?

Yes — both Open-Meteo and wttr.in send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Open-Meteo and wttr.in free for commercial use?

Open-Meteo is personal/non-commercial only, and wttr.in has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.