Open Food Facts vs RacingHub

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d39.2%99.02%
Uptime · 30d33.3%98.3%
P50 · ms1556473
P95 · ms28363557
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedCC BY 4.0 (source data from the F1DB project)
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no key required
Rate limitUnpublished100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Open Food Facts vs RacingHub: common questions

Which is more reliable, Open Food Facts or RacingHub?

On our scheduled checks, RacingHub leads on measured uptime — Open Food Facts at 39.2% versus RacingHub at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Open Food Facts or RacingHub?

RacingHub has the lower median latency in our checks — Open Food Facts responds in 1556 ms versus RacingHub at 473 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Open Food Facts and RacingHub need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Open Food Facts is callable with no signup, and RacingHub is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Open Food Facts and RacingHub from the browser?

Only RacingHub is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Open Food Facts needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Open Food Facts and RacingHub free for commercial use?

Open Food Facts has unclear commercial terms, and RacingHub has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.