Open Disease vs SportScore

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%87.3%
Uptime · 30d98.3%86.7%
P50 · ms451288
P95 · ms12262112
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (sources vary; see project repo)Unverified
Free tierFree — no key requiredFree — no key (attribution tier)
Rate limitUnpublishedRetry-After: 5s
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Open Disease vs SportScore: common questions

Which is more reliable, Open Disease or SportScore?

On our scheduled checks, Open Disease leads on measured uptime — Open Disease at 99.02% versus SportScore at 87.3% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Open Disease or SportScore?

SportScore has the lower median latency in our checks — Open Disease responds in 451 ms versus SportScore at 288 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Open Disease and SportScore need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Open Disease is callable with no signup, and SportScore is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Open Disease and SportScore from the browser?

Only Open Disease is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. SportScore needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Open Disease and SportScore free for commercial use?

Open Disease has unclear commercial terms, and SportScore has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.