shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

OOPSpam vs RandomUser

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIOOPSpamHEALTHY98RandomUserHEALTHY78
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms217210
P95 · ms360774
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified (generated data; sample photos governed by UI Faces terms)
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no key or signup
Rate limit1000 req/window · 999 remainingUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

OOPSpam vs RandomUser: common questions

Which is more reliable, OOPSpam or RandomUser?

Both are neck-and-neck — OOPSpam and RandomUser each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, OOPSpam or RandomUser?

RandomUser has the lower median latency in our checks — OOPSpam responds in 217 ms versus RandomUser at 210 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do OOPSpam and RandomUser need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — OOPSpam is callable with no signup, and RandomUser is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call OOPSpam and RandomUser from the browser?

Only RandomUser is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. OOPSpam needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are OOPSpam and RandomUser free for commercial use?

OOPSpam has unclear commercial terms, and RandomUser has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.