OOPSpam vs Random Profiles

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms217282
P95 · ms3602529
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limit1000 req/window · 999 remainingUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

OOPSpam vs Random Profiles: common questions

Which is more reliable, OOPSpam or Random Profiles?

Both are neck-and-neck — OOPSpam and Random Profiles each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, OOPSpam or Random Profiles?

OOPSpam has the lower median latency in our checks — OOPSpam responds in 217 ms versus Random Profiles at 282 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do OOPSpam and Random Profiles need an API key?

OOPSpam needs no key, while Random Profiles requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for OOPSpam first.

Can I call OOPSpam and Random Profiles from the browser?

Only Random Profiles is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. OOPSpam needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are OOPSpam and Random Profiles free for commercial use?

OOPSpam has unclear commercial terms, and Random Profiles has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.