OOPSpam vs Packagist
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
OOPSpam vs Packagist: common questions
Which is more reliable, OOPSpam or Packagist?
Both are neck-and-neck — OOPSpam and Packagist each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.
Which is faster, OOPSpam or Packagist?
Packagist has the lower median latency in our checks — OOPSpam responds in 217 ms versus Packagist at 61 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do OOPSpam and Packagist need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — OOPSpam is callable with no signup, and Packagist is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call OOPSpam and Packagist from the browser?
Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call OOPSpam and Packagist from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.
Are OOPSpam and Packagist free for commercial use?
OOPSpam has unclear commercial terms, and Packagist has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.