Noctua vs World Bank

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%96.1%
Uptime · 30d100%96.7%
P50 · ms742216
P95 · ms20371664
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearyes
Data licenseUnverifiedCC BY 4.0
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Noctua vs World Bank: common questions

Which is more reliable, Noctua or World Bank?

On our scheduled checks, Noctua leads on measured uptime — Noctua at 100% versus World Bank at 96.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Noctua or World Bank?

World Bank has the lower median latency in our checks — Noctua responds in 742 ms versus World Bank at 216 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Noctua and World Bank need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Noctua is callable with no signup, and World Bank is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Noctua and World Bank from the browser?

Only World Bank is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Noctua needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Noctua and World Bank free for commercial use?

Noctua has unclear commercial terms, and World Bank allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.