No-as-a-Service vs Passantenfrequenzen Zürich
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
No-as-a-Service vs Passantenfrequenzen Zürich: common questions
Which is more reliable, No-as-a-Service or Passantenfrequenzen Zürich?
On our scheduled checks, Passantenfrequenzen Zürich leads on measured uptime — No-as-a-Service at —% versus Passantenfrequenzen Zürich at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Do No-as-a-Service and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — No-as-a-Service is callable with no signup, and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call No-as-a-Service and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich from the browser?
Yes — both No-as-a-Service and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are No-as-a-Service and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich free for commercial use?
No-as-a-Service has unclear commercial terms, and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.