Newton vs TensorFeed

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms323306
P95 · ms1633752
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no key (static JSON feed endpoints)
Rate limitUnpublished120 req/window · 119 remaining · resets 60
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Newton vs TensorFeed: common questions

Which is more reliable, Newton or TensorFeed?

Both are neck-and-neck — Newton and TensorFeed each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Newton or TensorFeed?

TensorFeed has the lower median latency in our checks — Newton responds in 323 ms versus TensorFeed at 306 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Newton and TensorFeed need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Newton is callable with no signup, and TensorFeed is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Newton and TensorFeed from the browser?

Yes — both Newton and TensorFeed send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Newton and TensorFeed free for commercial use?

Newton has unclear commercial terms, and TensorFeed has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.