New York Times vs Wikipedia REST

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms
P95 · ms
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearyes
Data licenseUnverifiedCC BY-SA 4.0
Free tierFree tier — 500 requests/dayUnlimited within etiquette
Rate limit500 requests/day on free plan200/sec global courtesy cap
In directory since2026-07-052026-05-09
operationalpartialdownno data

New York Times vs Wikipedia REST: common questions

Which is more reliable, New York Times or Wikipedia REST?

On our scheduled checks, Wikipedia REST leads on measured uptime — New York Times at —% versus Wikipedia REST at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do New York Times and Wikipedia REST need an API key?

Wikipedia REST needs no key, while New York Times requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Wikipedia REST first.

Can I call New York Times and Wikipedia REST from the browser?

Yes — both New York Times and Wikipedia REST send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are New York Times and Wikipedia REST free for commercial use?

New York Times has unclear commercial terms, and Wikipedia REST allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.