Nager.Date vs TwitterApi.IO

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%98.0%
Uptime · 30d100%96.7%
P50 · ms58242
P95 · ms5532593
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree, no keyFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Nager.Date vs TwitterApi.IO: common questions

Which is more reliable, Nager.Date or TwitterApi.IO?

On our scheduled checks, Nager.Date leads on measured uptime — Nager.Date at 100% versus TwitterApi.IO at 98.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Nager.Date or TwitterApi.IO?

Nager.Date has the lower median latency in our checks — Nager.Date responds in 58 ms versus TwitterApi.IO at 242 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Nager.Date and TwitterApi.IO need an API key?

Nager.Date needs no key, while TwitterApi.IO requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Nager.Date first.

Can I call Nager.Date and TwitterApi.IO from the browser?

Only Nager.Date is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. TwitterApi.IO needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Nager.Date and TwitterApi.IO free for commercial use?

Nager.Date has unclear commercial terms, and TwitterApi.IO has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.