Musixmatch vs Wallhaven

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%82.4%
Uptime · 30d100%71.7%
P50 · ms559625
P95 · ms14863981
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublished45 req/window · 44 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Musixmatch vs Wallhaven: common questions

Which is more reliable, Musixmatch or Wallhaven?

On our scheduled checks, Musixmatch leads on measured uptime — Musixmatch at 100% versus Wallhaven at 82.4% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Musixmatch or Wallhaven?

Musixmatch has the lower median latency in our checks — Musixmatch responds in 559 ms versus Wallhaven at 625 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Musixmatch and Wallhaven need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Musixmatch uses an API key and Wallhaven uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Musixmatch and Wallhaven from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Musixmatch and Wallhaven from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Musixmatch and Wallhaven free for commercial use?

Musixmatch has unclear commercial terms, and Wallhaven has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.