Monster Hunter World vs XIVAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d97.1%100%
Uptime · 30d95.0%100%
P50 · ms962578
P95 · ms30491451
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified; game content © CapcomUnverified; game content © Square Enix
Free tierFree, no API key requiredFree; optional free key raises limits
Rate limitUnpublishedRate-limited; higher limits with a free key (see docs)
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Monster Hunter World vs XIVAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, Monster Hunter World or XIVAPI?

On our scheduled checks, XIVAPI leads on measured uptime — Monster Hunter World at 97.1% versus XIVAPI at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Monster Hunter World or XIVAPI?

XIVAPI has the lower median latency in our checks — Monster Hunter World responds in 962 ms versus XIVAPI at 578 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Monster Hunter World and XIVAPI need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Monster Hunter World is callable with no signup, and XIVAPI is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Monster Hunter World and XIVAPI from the browser?

Yes — both Monster Hunter World and XIVAPI send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Monster Hunter World and XIVAPI free for commercial use?

Monster Hunter World has unclear commercial terms, and XIVAPI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.