shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Monster Hunter World vs PotterDB

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIMonster Hunter WorldNEW—PotterDBNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified; game content © CapcomUnverified (data derived from Harry Potter Fandom, CC BY-SA)
Free tierFree, no API key requiredFree — no key
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Monster Hunter World vs PotterDB: common questions

Which is more reliable, Monster Hunter World or PotterDB?

On our scheduled checks, PotterDB leads on measured uptime — Monster Hunter World at —% versus PotterDB at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Monster Hunter World and PotterDB need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Monster Hunter World is callable with no signup, and PotterDB is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Monster Hunter World and PotterDB from the browser?

Yes — both Monster Hunter World and PotterDB send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Monster Hunter World and PotterDB free for commercial use?

Monster Hunter World has unclear commercial terms, and PotterDB has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.