Minecraft ServerHub vs PotterDB

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d86.1%99.44%
Uptime · 30d58.3%100%
P50 · ms1003326
P95 · ms24401015
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified (data derived from Harry Potter Fandom, CC BY-SA)
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no key
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Minecraft ServerHub vs PotterDB: common questions

Which is more reliable, Minecraft ServerHub or PotterDB?

On our scheduled checks, PotterDB leads on measured uptime — Minecraft ServerHub at 86.1% versus PotterDB at 99.44% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Minecraft ServerHub or PotterDB?

PotterDB has the lower median latency in our checks — Minecraft ServerHub responds in 1003 ms versus PotterDB at 326 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Minecraft ServerHub and PotterDB need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Minecraft ServerHub is callable with no signup, and PotterDB is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Minecraft ServerHub and PotterDB from the browser?

Only PotterDB is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Minecraft ServerHub needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Minecraft ServerHub and PotterDB free for commercial use?

Minecraft ServerHub has unclear commercial terms, and PotterDB has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.