shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Micro User Service vs Warnely

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIMicro User ServiceDEAD0WarnelyDYING89
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d18.6%90.2%
Uptime · 30d0.0%83.3%
P50 · ms231334
P95 · ms8271375
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Micro User Service vs Warnely: common questions

Which is more reliable, Micro User Service or Warnely?

On our scheduled checks, Warnely leads on measured uptime — Micro User Service at 18.6% versus Warnely at 90.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Micro User Service or Warnely?

Micro User Service has the lower median latency in our checks — Micro User Service responds in 231 ms versus Warnely at 334 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Micro User Service and Warnely need an API key?

Warnely needs no key, while Micro User Service requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Warnely first.

Can I call Micro User Service and Warnely from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Micro User Service and Warnely from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Micro User Service and Warnely free for commercial use?

Micro User Service has unclear commercial terms, and Warnely has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.