Metro Lisboa vs Transport for Sweden

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms1308815
P95 · ms24591821
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublished60 req/window · 58 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Metro Lisboa vs Transport for Sweden: common questions

Which is more reliable, Metro Lisboa or Transport for Sweden?

Both are neck-and-neck — Metro Lisboa and Transport for Sweden each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Metro Lisboa or Transport for Sweden?

Transport for Sweden has the lower median latency in our checks — Metro Lisboa responds in 1308 ms versus Transport for Sweden at 815 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Metro Lisboa and Transport for Sweden need an API key?

Metro Lisboa needs no key, while Transport for Sweden requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Metro Lisboa first.

Can I call Metro Lisboa and Transport for Sweden from the browser?

Only Transport for Sweden is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Metro Lisboa needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Metro Lisboa and Transport for Sweden free for commercial use?

Metro Lisboa has unclear commercial terms, and Transport for Sweden has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.