Metro Lisboa vs Transport for Spain

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms1308603
P95 · ms24591720
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Metro Lisboa vs Transport for Spain: common questions

Which is more reliable, Metro Lisboa or Transport for Spain?

Both are neck-and-neck — Metro Lisboa and Transport for Spain each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Metro Lisboa or Transport for Spain?

Transport for Spain has the lower median latency in our checks — Metro Lisboa responds in 1308 ms versus Transport for Spain at 603 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Metro Lisboa and Transport for Spain need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Metro Lisboa is callable with no signup, and Transport for Spain is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Metro Lisboa and Transport for Spain from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Metro Lisboa and Transport for Spain from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Metro Lisboa and Transport for Spain free for commercial use?

Metro Lisboa has unclear commercial terms, and Transport for Spain has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.