shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Metro Lisboa vs Transport for Los Angeles, US

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIMetro LisboaNEW—Transport for Los Angeles, USNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Metro Lisboa vs Transport for Los Angeles, US: common questions

Which is more reliable, Metro Lisboa or Transport for Los Angeles, US?

On our scheduled checks, Transport for Los Angeles, US leads on measured uptime — Metro Lisboa at —% versus Transport for Los Angeles, US at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Metro Lisboa and Transport for Los Angeles, US need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Metro Lisboa is callable with no signup, and Transport for Los Angeles, US is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Metro Lisboa and Transport for Los Angeles, US from the browser?

Only Transport for Los Angeles, US is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Metro Lisboa needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Metro Lisboa and Transport for Los Angeles, US free for commercial use?

Metro Lisboa has unclear commercial terms, and Transport for Los Angeles, US has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.