Metro Lisboa vs PostalPinCode

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%98.0%
Uptime · 30d100%98.3%
P50 · ms1308912
P95 · ms24593724
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Metro Lisboa vs PostalPinCode: common questions

Which is more reliable, Metro Lisboa or PostalPinCode?

On our scheduled checks, Metro Lisboa leads on measured uptime — Metro Lisboa at 100% versus PostalPinCode at 98.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Metro Lisboa or PostalPinCode?

PostalPinCode has the lower median latency in our checks — Metro Lisboa responds in 1308 ms versus PostalPinCode at 912 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Metro Lisboa and PostalPinCode need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Metro Lisboa is callable with no signup, and PostalPinCode is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Metro Lisboa and PostalPinCode from the browser?

Only PostalPinCode is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Metro Lisboa needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Metro Lisboa and PostalPinCode free for commercial use?

Metro Lisboa has unclear commercial terms, and PostalPinCode has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.