mailboxlayer vs Telegraph

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms208444
P95 · ms26343497
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

mailboxlayer vs Telegraph: common questions

Which is more reliable, mailboxlayer or Telegraph?

Both are neck-and-neck — mailboxlayer and Telegraph each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, mailboxlayer or Telegraph?

mailboxlayer has the lower median latency in our checks — mailboxlayer responds in 208 ms versus Telegraph at 444 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do mailboxlayer and Telegraph need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — mailboxlayer uses an API key and Telegraph uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call mailboxlayer and Telegraph from the browser?

Only Telegraph is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. mailboxlayer needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are mailboxlayer and Telegraph free for commercial use?

mailboxlayer has unclear commercial terms, and Telegraph has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.