mail.tm vs Remotive
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
mail.tm vs Remotive: common questions
Which is more reliable, mail.tm or Remotive?
On our scheduled checks, Remotive leads on measured uptime — mail.tm at 84.3% versus Remotive at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, mail.tm or Remotive?
Remotive has the lower median latency in our checks — mail.tm responds in 709 ms versus Remotive at 612 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do mail.tm and Remotive need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — mail.tm is callable with no signup, and Remotive is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call mail.tm and Remotive from the browser?
Only Remotive is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. mail.tm needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are mail.tm and Remotive free for commercial use?
mail.tm has unclear commercial terms, and Remotive has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.