Magic: The Gathering vs PotterDB
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Magic: The Gathering vs PotterDB: common questions
Which is more reliable, Magic: The Gathering or PotterDB?
On our scheduled checks, PotterDB leads on measured uptime — Magic: The Gathering at 98.0% versus PotterDB at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Magic: The Gathering or PotterDB?
Magic: The Gathering has the lower median latency in our checks — Magic: The Gathering responds in 394 ms versus PotterDB at 525 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Magic: The Gathering and PotterDB need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Magic: The Gathering is callable with no signup, and PotterDB is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Magic: The Gathering and PotterDB from the browser?
Yes — both Magic: The Gathering and PotterDB send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are Magic: The Gathering and PotterDB free for commercial use?
Magic: The Gathering has unclear commercial terms, and PotterDB has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.