Magic: The Gathering vs PotterDB

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms
P95 · ms
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified (data derived from Harry Potter Fandom, CC BY-SA)
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no key
Rate limit1000 req/window · 999 remainingUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Magic: The Gathering vs PotterDB: common questions

Which is more reliable, Magic: The Gathering or PotterDB?

On our scheduled checks, PotterDB leads on measured uptime — Magic: The Gathering at —% versus PotterDB at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Magic: The Gathering and PotterDB need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Magic: The Gathering is callable with no signup, and PotterDB is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Magic: The Gathering and PotterDB from the browser?

Yes — both Magic: The Gathering and PotterDB send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Magic: The Gathering and PotterDB free for commercial use?

Magic: The Gathering has unclear commercial terms, and PotterDB has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.