shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Magic 8-Ball API vs mail.tm

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIMagic 8-Ball APIHEALTHY95mail.tmHEALTHY82
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%84.3%
Uptime · 30d100%75.0%
P50 · ms442709
P95 · ms11342351
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — temporary mailboxes
Rate limitUnpublishedRate limited (429 on exceed); exact policy per docs.mail.tm
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Magic 8-Ball API vs mail.tm: common questions

Which is more reliable, Magic 8-Ball API or mail.tm?

On our scheduled checks, Magic 8-Ball API leads on measured uptime — Magic 8-Ball API at 100% versus mail.tm at 84.3% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Magic 8-Ball API or mail.tm?

Magic 8-Ball API has the lower median latency in our checks — Magic 8-Ball API responds in 442 ms versus mail.tm at 709 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Magic 8-Ball API and mail.tm need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Magic 8-Ball API is callable with no signup, and mail.tm is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Magic 8-Ball API and mail.tm from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Magic 8-Ball API and mail.tm from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Magic 8-Ball API and mail.tm free for commercial use?

Magic 8-Ball API has unclear commercial terms, and mail.tm has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.